Additional information

December 21, 2011

Hidden But Not Gone

You know, while I was trying to think up an appropriate title I noticed that I have virtually no consistency in how I capitalize my blog titles.  Go ahead, look, my first post all words start with a capital letter, second post only the first word begins that way.  Literally every other post I made in October has all words begin capitalized like a book would, and then the others I just capitalize the first word, as though it was a sentence, I didn't even notice that until now.  I'm sorry, we should all know by now that I'm now stranger to irrelevant tangents, but this whole paragraph is just worthless, I guess that's what happens when you do an entire post in one sitting.


^Don't read that.^

Let's talk about perception filters.  This seems to be a very common occurrence in the Slender-afflicted community, I have even noticed several specific instances of it I have been directly involved with.  Despite their obvious uses and purposes, perception filters should not be confused with either invisibility, or the actual removal of information.  In fact, from a purely theoretical standpoint, invisibility would actually be considered an easier accomplishment, to make something invisible you simply need to bend light around it, or perhaps project something on top of it; but finding a way to censor data so that only specific people can see, or fail to see, it, without using some kind of identifier like a password should be far more difficult.  From what I can tell, there seems to be two kinds of perception filters (well obviously you could argue this several different ways, but for explanatory purposes let's assume that the most important thing is how many people are filtered): individual filters, and group filters.  As I believe the former is easier to explain I'll begin there..

Individual perception filters are filters that are placed over a single individual that result in them not being able to see something, or altering their perception of it.  It's relatively simple to explain, because the filter can easily be said to originate with the individual.  Individual perception filters deal with the mind of the afflicted person,  they set up barriers created by an external, or sometimes internal, entity to block or alter something.  These can be very broad alterations, like not being able to see anything on a specific subject, to very specific changes, such as not being able to locate a door right in front of you.  However, there is likely little variation from instance to instance, each encounter with whatever was being filtered should be the same as the past encounter, unless the filter has been cracked or destroyed.  

Group filters are more complicated, in that they likely stem from the thing being filtered, rather than being a case of multiple individual filters (though such possibilities are not out of the question).  A great example to use when talking about this is how nobody perceives the Tall Guy quite the same (if at all).  While he has appeared in "plain view" of several non-hunted people before, most instances show him not being perceived at all by them, though in some cases witnesses have apparently seen him as a regular person.  This shows how the filter changes a bit from person to person, and sometimes from encounter to encounter by the same people.  I believe this is because the filter doesn't take place in the affected's heads, but rather comes from Slender himself.  This also explains why the effect fails when viewing it back on a video tape, without the source there to exert the actual filter, people can perceive what was actually there.  This becomes tricky, however, when filters take on a more layered approach, with the sharp dressed man there is only really the hunted and the ignorant, and, assuming he marks his victims in some kind of physical or psychological way, there could be a variety of ways the filter could just pass over the proper group.  But when it comes to other things, where the differences between those subject to the filter and those who are not aren't so clear, things get a bit more confusing.  Because I'm lazy, and I haven't slept in a good 20 hours now, I'll save you my highly speculative thoughts on how that works, looking back it's not like my better grounded ideas have had the best wording thus far.

Well that's all I've got for you on perception filters, I actually typed out another paragraph, but then I read back over it and realized it was virtually unreadable.  Anyways, I'm sure none of you can see this post, except for Gargoyle, who's probably mad I made a post in this topic a full 12 hours before he makes one on the exact same subject (please be true, I feel like we're going for some kind of record here).

See you around
Cage

9 comments:

  1. Well, such a topic was certainly on my list, yes... I'm working on writing up something a little ahh... "Different" at the moment though. Gonna use that scheduled post option to release it a good bit earlier than I'd normally post. Nothing important really... I just felt compelled to do it all of a sudden.

    I am however, somewhat fascinated and also worriedly conflicted by the concept that only I can view this particular posting. If it's true then... well... that's a trick I'm going to have to make you teach me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ... What if someone else could read this post that obviously I cannot see or perceive whatsoever? Theoretically? o_____o

    xo
    BR

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eh, there's no perception filter on this post, if someone can't see it it's something to do with them, not me. I'd love to figure out a way to make perception filters, but I'm not quite sure how I'd go about learning such a thing, the theory is easy, but implementation would be very difficult. I think that a subject focused filter could be defeated by someone not subject to the filter relaying the information elsewhere, much like people can tell other people about the Slender man. But if it's an individual filter, then it's likely that whatever's being filtered can't be seen until the filter is broken, no matter who tries to relay the information.

    See you around
    - Cage

    ReplyDelete
  4. They're not the easiest to explain how to make them work either. At least our facilities version isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes I'd remembered you mentioning you had one, I'd be quite intrested in hearing how that functions. Perheaps I could take a look at some point, if you'd allow it. I'm still hopeful about seeing one of you facilities at some point.

    See you around
    -Cage

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh good, other people commented here and you basically confirmed you were messing with me or something. That makes me feel better... Something about the thought that there was something only I could see sounded just about as terrifying a premise as there being something I couldn't see that everyone else could...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Question: what happens when you can see all the places the pages are torn and bled-through?

    Answer: You get someone like me! Ha. Fucking love this. Gonna be back soon, doll, don't forget me now. We still gotta talk.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I would never dare forget you, and talking with you is always something I enjoy.

    See you around
    - Cage

    ReplyDelete
  9. And you didn't forget how to get ahold of me, either. Very good, very good. So.. you wouldn't dare? I'm happy to know speaking with me is a pleasure, with some I get the impression it's not the case.

    ReplyDelete